A fantastic interview with one of the best composers scoring films right now:
Jeremiah 5:30-31 sounds so much like much of the popular evangelicalism that promotes the idea of ongoing new words from God (eg: Bethel church in Redding):
An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land:
the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so, but what will you do when the end comes?
The chief work of a Christian is to make all his affections, in all their operations, subservient unto the life of God, and he who is wise will keep a continual watch over those wherein he finds the greatest reluctancy thereunto.
. . .
There is no greater spiritual judgment than for men to be given up unto themselves and their own evil affections
Some quick thoughts on this WSJ opinion piece on Israel: The roots of anti-Semitism.
I think Satan has probably capitalized on those factors mentioned in the article to specifically attack Israel, especially when he knew the Messiah would come through the ethnically Israelite part of the Church. He was preoccupied with that portion of the Church for quite some time, as the vivid imagery of Revelation 12:4 shows: “And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, so that when it bore her child he might devour it.” But post-incarnation, as God has continued to graft more gentiles into the Church that was at one time mostly ethnically Israelite, I think Satan’s focus is less on ethnic Israel and moreso the global Church (although I’m sure Rom. 11:25-26 gnaws at him considerably).
But it’s not surprising to me that Israel continues to be the subject of much hatred. The old feuds go back very far, and I suspect that the current animosity between Israel and Arab peoples is not based on theological differences (as it was in the OT), but more simply hatred due to the fact that they have long been at odds. So now the fighting is because each side wants to beat the other.
As far as the western countries are concerned, here is my theory. I think that the US’s support of Israel in recent history has been largely based on theological beliefs – especially the interpretative novelties of 20th century dispensationalism that sees Israel as central to God’s future/end times plans, and understand verses like “pray for the peace of Israel” to be a command to endorse and support that nation however we can. However, as the US theologically liberalizes, we are moving farther away from any biblical foundation and so find ourselves more uncertain about what we should be doing in relation to Israel and why. I think this is also why a lot of other Western countries are becoming more wary of Israel (which may sometimes be [or wrongly understood as] antisemitic). They wonder why Israel should be the favored child in the Middle East, especially if, as George W. theorized, everyone longs for democracy, some people just need to be liberated from their oppressive governments so that they have the ability to choose democracy.
I think our response to this is threefold:
First, we try to know and understand history (I saw a horrific survey a couple months back reported that approximately 66% of millennials had no clue what Auschwitz was). Being educated helps us to make wise social, economic, and political decisions going forward. It also helps us make wise decisions about what our country should be doing in the middle east (which, on the surface, may look similar to our current alliance with Israel) without (un)consciously trying to fulfill some sort of perceived biblical mandate. Which leads to my second point:
Second, we believers need to do some hard work to strip our theology of the end times baggage that dispensationalism (Hal Lindsey, Left Behind, and pretty much every other modern non-reformed pastor) has saddled the church with. (How many countless hours and dollars do evangelicals waste trying to read current geo-political events into Revelation/Daniel, or in their support of Israel because they see the (existence of the) nation state as integral to God’s end time plan?) It is unbiblical and wastes the resources of the Body.
Finally, we should call a spade a spade by acknowledging when Israel has the right of something…but also when the muslim countries do. Muslims are not automatically wrong by virtue of their spiritual unbelief. Israel is probably just as unbelieving as a nation as many majority-Muslim countries.
The Angel of the Lord is commonly thought to be a reference to the pre-incarnate Jesus; the second person of the Trinity. The Angel is first mentioned in the scripture when he appears to Hagar in Genesis 16, and lovingly encourages her with direction and hope. A beautiful introduction to the gracious activity of our Savior.
In his commentary on Isaiah 24:1-20 – the beginning of a three chapter section known as “The Isaiah Apocalypse” – Alec Motyer writes:
At the heart of this passage lies a truth found also in the parallel passages in the preceding cycles: the centrality of the Lord’s people in the Lord’s plans for the world. When the final crisis comes on the world, this principle holds firm: safety for the Lord’s remnant. Thus we hear the stilling of the song of the world (verses 7-12) and the rising of the song of the remnant (verses 13-16a). In a collapsing world the people whose joy is the Lord are secure.
I hear people say, “Doctrine divides.” Of course doctrine divides, but it also unites. It unites the ones who love God’s truth and are willing to worship Him according to that truth. God wants people to worship Him from the heart and from a mind that is informed of who He is by His Word.